Communication on Progress
- Participant
- Published
-
- 05-May-2016
- Time period
-
- May 2015 – May 2016
- Files
- Links
- Format
-
- Stand alone document
- Differentiation Level
-
- This COP qualifies for the Global Compact Advanced level
- Self-assessment
-
- Includes a CEO statement of continued support for the UN Global Compact and its ten principles
- Description of actions or relevant policies related to Human Rights
- Description of actions or relevant policies related to Labour
- Description of actions or relevant policies related to Environment
- Description of actions or relevant policies related to Anti-Corruption
- Includes a measurement of outcomes
- Meets all criteria for the GC Advanced level
- Verification
and Transparency - How is the accuracy and completeness of information in your COP assessed by a credible third-party?
-
Information is assured by independent assurors (e.g., accounting or consulting firm) against recognized assurance standard (e.g., ISAE3000, AA1000AS, other national or industry-specific standard)
-
The COP describes any action(s) that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to have the credibility of the information in its COP externally assessed, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
-
Information is reviewed by multiple stakeholders (e.g., representatives of groups prioritized in stakeholder analysis)
-
Information is reviewed by a panel of peers (e.g., members of the same industry, competitors, benchmarked leaders, others organized via Global Compact Local Network)
-
Information is assured by independent assurors (e.g., accounting or consulting firm) using their own proprietary methodology
-
Other established or emerging best practices
- The COP incorporates the following high standards of transparency and disclosure:
-
Is 'in accordance - core' with GRI Standards
-
Applies the GRI Sustainability Reporting Guidelines or the GRI Standards
-
Is 'in accordance - comprehensive' with GRI Standards
-
Applies elements of the International Integrated Reporting Framework
-
Provides information on the company’s profile and context of operation
- Strategy, Governance
and Engagement - Criterion 1: The COP describes mainstreaming into corporate functions and business units
-
Place responsibility for execution of sustainability strategy in relevant corporate functions (procurement, government affairs, human resources, legal, etc) ensuring that no function is conflicting with company sustainability commitments and objectives
-
Align strategies, goals and incentive structures of all business units and subsidiaries with corporate sustainability strategy
-
Assign responsibility for corporate sustainability implementation to an individual or group within each business unit and subsidiary
-
Design corporate sustainability strategy to leverage synergies between and among issue areas and to deal adequately with trade-offs
-
Ensure that different corporate functions coordinate closely to maximize performance and avoid unintended negative impacts
-
Other established or emerging best practices
We have adopted the UN Sustainable Development Goals as the framework for measuring our impact on society.
-
Any relevant policies, procedures, and activities that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to fulfill this criterion, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
- Criterion 2: The COP describes value chain implementation
-
Any relevant policies, procedures, and activities that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to fulfill this criterion, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
-
Analyze each segment of the value chain carefully, both upstream and downstream, when mapping risks, opportunities and impacts
-
Communicate policies and expectations to suppliers and other relevant business partners
-
Implement monitoring and assurance mechanisms (e.g. audits/screenings) for compliance within the company’s sphere of influence
-
Undertake awareness-raising, training and other types of capacity building with suppliers and other business partners
-
Other established or emerging best practices
Through transparency and engaegment, Ericsson works to build trust across the value chain. Ericsson's "Beyond Monitoring" program focuses on increased preventative and joint development initiatives for service suppliers.
- Human Rights
- Criterion 4: The COP describes effective management systems to integrate the human rights principles
-
Process to ensure that internationally recognized human rights are respected
-
On-going due diligence process that includes an assessment of actual and potential human rights impacts (BRE 2 + BRE 3 + ARE 2 + ARE 3)
-
Internal awareness-raising and training on human rights for management and employees
-
Operational-level grievance mechanisms for those potentially impacted by the company’s activities (BRE 4 + ARE 4)
-
Allocation of responsibilities and accountability for addressing human rights impacts
-
Internal decision-making, budget and oversight for effective responses to human rights impacts
-
Processes to provide for or cooperate in the remediation of adverse human rights impacts that the company has caused or contributed to (BRE 3+ BRE 4 + ARE3 + ARE 4)
-
Process and programs in place to support human rights through: core business; strategic philanthropic/social investment; public policy engagement/advocacy; partnerships and/or other forms of collective action (BRE 6 + ARE 6)
-
Other established or emerging best practices
During 2015, we strengthened integration of human rights considerations in Mergers and Acquisitions, focused on options and innovations for using leverage to reduce risks to human rights within our value chain.
-
Any relevant policies, procedures, and activities that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to fulfill this criterion, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
- Criterion 5: The COP describes effective monitoring and evaluation mechanisms of human rights integration
-
System to monitor the effectiveness of human rights policies and implementation with quantitative and qualitative metrics, including in the supply chain (BRE3 + ARE3)
-
Monitoring draws from internal and external feedback, including affected stakeholders
-
Leadership review of monitoring and improvement results
-
Process to deal with incidents the company has caused or contributed to for internal and external stakeholders (BRE 4 + ARE 4)
-
Grievance mechanisms that are legitimate, accessible, predictable, equitable, transparent, rights-compatible, a source of continuous learning, and based on engagement and dialogue (BRE4 + ARE4)
-
Outcomes of integration of the human rights principles
-
Other established or emerging best practices
Ericsson conducted Human Rights Impact Assessments as part of the Sales Compliance process and according to UNGP in Myanmar and Iran, and initiated an assessment in Ethiopia.
-
Any relevant policies, procedures, and activities that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to fulfill this criterion, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
- Criterion 3: The COP describes robust commitments, strategies or policies in the area of human rights
-
Commitment to comply with all applicable laws and respect internationally recognized human rights, wherever the company operates (e.g., the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Guiding Principles on Human Rights) (BRE1 + ARE1)
-
Integrated or stand-alone statement of policy expressing commitment to respect and support human rights approved at the most senior level of the company (BRE 1 + BRE5 + ARE 1 + ARE 5)
-
Statement of policy stipulating human rights expectations of personnel, business partners and other parties directly linked to operations, products or services (BRE 1)
-
Statement of policy publicly available and communicated internally and externally to all personnel, business partners and other relevant parties (BRE 1 + BRE 5 + ARE 1 + ARE 5)
-
Other established or emerging best practices
For the second year Ericsson is reporting according the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights Reporting Framework and this year have added a UNGP Reporting Framework index in our Sustainability and CR report.
-
Any relevant policies, procedures, and activities that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to fulfill this criterion, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
- Labour
- Criterion 8: The COP describes effective monitoring and evaluation mechanisms of labour principles integration
-
System to track and measure performance based on standardized performance metrics
-
Dialogues with the representative organization of workers to regularly review progress made and jointly identify priorities for the future
-
Audits or other steps to monitor and improve the working conditions of companies in the supply chain, in line with principles of international labour standards
-
Process to positively engage with the suppliers to address the challenges (i.e., partnership approach instead of corrective approach) through schemes to improve workplace practices
-
Outcomes of integration of the Labour principles
-
Any relevant policies, procedures, and activities that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to fulfill this criterion, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
-
Other established or emerging best practices
- Criterion 6: The COP describes robust commitments, strategies or policies in the area of labour
-
Reference to principles of relevant international labour standards (ILO Conventions) and other normative international instruments in company policies
-
Reflection on the relevance of the labour principles for the company
-
Written company policy to obey national labour law, respect principles of relevant international labour standards in worldwide company operations and engage in dialogue with representative organization of the workers (international, sectoral, national).
-
Inclusion of reference to the principles contained in the relevant international labour standards in contracts with suppliers and other relevant business partners
-
Specific commitments and Human Resources policies, in line with national development priorities or decent work priorities in the country of operation
-
Participation and leadership by employers’ organizations (international and national) to jointly address challenges related to labour standards in the countries of operation, possibly in a tripartite approach (business – trade union – government).
-
Other established or emerging best practices
Ericsson takes an inclusive and transparent approach to Occupational Health and Safety, including our supply chain. By being transparent, we encourage others in our sector to follow suit.
-
Any relevant policies, procedures, and activities that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to fulfill this criterion, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
-
Structural engagement with a global union, possibly via a Global Framework Agreement
- Criterion 7: The COP describes effective management systems to integrate the labour principles
-
Risk and impact assessments in the area of labour
-
Dialogue mechanism with trade unions to regularly discuss and review company progress in addressing labour standards
-
Allocation of responsibilities and accountability within the organization
-
Internal awareness-raising and training on the labour principles for management and employees
-
Active engagement with suppliers to address labour-related challenges
-
Grievance mechanisms, communication channels and other procedures (e.g., whistleblower mechanisms) available for workers to report concerns, make suggestions or seek advice, designed and operated in line with the representative organization of workers
-
Other established or emerging best practices
In 2015, Ericsson established Zero Tolerance Safety Rules regarding workplace safety, and rolled out a global toolkit for assessing and managing and managing social work environment risks and stress.
-
Any relevant policies, procedures, and activities that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to fulfill this criterion, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
- Environment
- Criterion 11: The COP describes effective monitoring and evaluation mechanisms for environmental stewardship
-
System to track and measure performance based on standardized performance metrics
-
Leadership review of monitoring and improvement results
-
Process to deal with incidents
-
Audits or other steps to monitor and improve the environmental performance of companies in the supply chain
-
Outcomes of integration of the environmental principles
-
Other established or emerging best practices
We have over 20-years of Life Cycle Assessment experience and use this methodology to determine significant environmental aspects and to assess the impacts of ICT.
-
Any relevant policies, procedures, and activities that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to fulfill this criterion, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
- Criterion 10: The COP describes effective management systems to integrate the environmental principles
-
Environmental risk and impact assessments
-
Assessments of lifecycle impact of products, ensuring environmentally sound management policies
-
Allocation of responsibilities and accountability within the organisation
-
Internal awareness-raising and training on environmental stewardship for management and employees
-
Grievance mechanisms, communication channels and other procedures (e.g. whistleblower mechanisms) for reporting concerns or seeking advice regarding environmental impacts
-
Other established or emerging best practices
To ensure sound handling of products at the end-of-life, Ericsson's Product Take-back program is made available to all Ericsson's customers globally, not only in markets required by law.
-
Any relevant policies, procedures, and activities that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to fulfill this criterion, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
- Criterion 9: The COP describes robust commitments, strategies or policies in the area of environmental stewardship
-
Reference to relevant international conventions and other international instruments (e.g. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development)
-
Reflection on the relevance of environmental stewardship for the company
-
Written company policy on environmental stewardship
-
Inclusion of minimum environmental standards in contracts with suppliers and other relevant business partners
-
Specific commitments and goals for specified years
-
Other established or emerging best practices
We continue to focus on providing solutions to help other sectors of the economy to offset carbon emissions. We delivered on a target to reduce twice as much societal CO2 emissions via our product and service offerings as from our own operations.
-
Any relevant policies, procedures, and activities that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to fulfill this criterion, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
- Anti-Corruption
- Criterion 13: The COP describes effective management systems to integrate the anti-corruption principle
-
Support by the organization’s leadership for anti-corruption (B4)
-
Carrying out risk assessment of potential areas of corruption (D3)
-
Human Resources procedures supporting the anti-corruption commitment or policy, including communication to and training for all employees (B5 + D8)
-
Internal checks and balances to ensure consistency with the anti-corruption commitment (B6)
-
Actions taken to encourage business partners to implement anti-corruption commitments (D6)
-
Management responsibility and accountability for implementation of the anti-corruption commitment or policy (D7)
-
Communications (whistleblowing) channels and follow-up mechanisms for reporting concerns or seeking advice (D9)
-
Internal accounting and auditing procedures related to anticorruption (D10)
-
Other established or emerging best practices
To foster individual accountability, Ericsson employees periodically acknowledge the Code of Business Ethics. In 2015, 99% of active employees acknowledged Ericsson's Code of Business Ethics.
-
Any relevant policies, procedures, and activities that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to fulfill this criterion, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
- Criterion 14: The COP describes effective monitoring and evaluation mechanisms for the integration of anti-corruption
-
Leadership review of monitoring and improvement results (D12)
-
Process to deal with incidents (D13)
-
Public legal cases regarding corruption (D14)
-
Use of independent external assurance of anti-corruption programmes (D15)
-
Outcomes of integration of the anti-corruption principle
-
Any relevant policies, procedures, and activities that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to fulfill this criterion, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
-
Other established or emerging best practices
- Criterion 12: The COP describes robust commitments, strategies or policies in the area of anti-corruption
-
Publicly stated formal policy of zero-tolerance of corruption (D1)
-
Commitment to be in compliance with all relevant anti-corruption laws, including the implementation of procedures to know the law and monitor changes (B2)
-
Statement of support for international and regional legal frameworks, such as the UN Convention against Corruption (D2)
-
Detailed policies for high-risk areas of corruption (D4)
-
Policy on anti-corruption regarding business partners (D5)
-
Other established or emerging best practices
Ericsson is a signatory of the Partnership Against Corruption Initiative of the World Economic Forum, which includes a commitment to zero-tolerance for corruption.
-
Any relevant policies, procedures, and activities that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to fulfill this criterion, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
- UN Goals and Issues
- Criterion 15: The COP describes core business contributions to UN goals and issues
-
Align core business strategy with one or more relevant UN goals/issues
-
Develop relevant products and services or design business models that contribute to UN goals/issues
-
Adopt and modify operating procedures to maximize contribution to UN goals/issues
-
Other established or emerging best practices
Ericsson's Sustainability and CR strategy embraces the UN SDGs and we have adopted the SDGs as a framework for measuring our impact on society.
-
Any relevant policies, procedures, and activities that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to fulfill this criterion, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
- Criterion 16: The COP describes strategic social investments and philanthropy
-
Pursue social investments and philanthropic contributions that tie in with the core competencies or operating context of the company as an integrated part of its sustainability strategy
-
Coordinate efforts with other organizations and initiatives to amplify—and not negate or unnecessarily duplicate—the efforts of other contributors
-
Other established or emerging best practices
Philanthropy per se is not part of Ericsson's approach, rather working in public-private partnership with UN and other partners to use our technology and expertise to support initiatives to help advance society through sustainable development.
-
Any relevant policies, procedures, and activities that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to fulfill this criterion, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
-
Take responsibility for the intentional and unintentional effects of funding and have due regard for local customs, traditions, religions, and priorities of pertinent individuals and groups
- Criterion 18: The COP describes partnerships and collective action
-
Develop and implement partnership projects with public or private organizations (UN entities, government, NGOs, or other groups) on core business, social investments and/or advocacy
-
Join industry peers, UN entities and/or other stakeholders in initiatives contributing to solving common challenges and dilemmas at the global and/or local levels with an emphasis on initiatives extending the company’s positive impact on its value chain
-
Other established or emerging best practices
Ericsson Response, the company's flagship employee volunteer program, celebrated its 15-year anniversary, as a pioneering public-private partnership to support the World Food Programme-led Emergency Telecom Cluster in humanitarian relief efforts.
-
Any relevant policies, procedures, and activities that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to fulfill this criterion, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
- Criterion 17: The COP describes advocacy and public policy engagement
-
Publicly advocate the importance of action in relation to one or more UN goals/issues
-
Commit company leaders to participate in key summits, conferences, and other important public policy interactions in relation to one or more UN goals/issues
-
Other established or emerging best practices
Ericsson's CEO joined the Board of the UN Foundation during 2015, and is also a member of the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network, UN Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development and Business and Sustainable Development Commission.
-
Any relevant policies, procedures, and activities that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to fulfill this criterion, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
- Governance
- Criterion 19: The COP describes CEO commitment and leadership
-
CEO leads executive management team in development of corporate sustainability strategy, defining goals and overseeing implementation
-
CEO publicly delivers explicit statements and demonstrates personal leadership on sustainability and commitment to the UN Global Compact
-
CEO promotes initiatives to enhance sustainability of the company’s sector and leads development of industry standards
-
Other established or emerging best practices
Ericsson's CEO joined the Board of the UN Foundation during 2015, and is also a member of the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network, UN Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development and Business and Sustainable Development Commission.
-
Any relevant policies, procedures, and activities that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to fulfill this criterion, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
-
Make sustainability criteria and UN Global Compact principles part of goals and incentive schemes for CEO and executive management team
- Criterion 21: The COP describes stakeholder engagement
-
Publicly recognize responsibility for the company’s impacts on internal and external stakeholders
-
Define sustainability strategies, goals and policies in consultation with key stakeholders
-
Consult stakeholders in dealing with implementation dilemmas and challenges and invite them to take active part in reviewing performance
-
Establish channels to engage with employees and other stakeholders to hear their ideas and address their concerns
-
Any relevant policies, procedures, and activities that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to fulfill this criterion, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
-
Other established or emerging best practices
- Criterion 20: The COP describes Board adoption and oversight
-
Board of Directors (or equivalent) assumes responsibility and oversight for long-term corporate sustainability strategy and performance
-
Other established or emerging best practices
In management of sustainability and CR, the Board of Directors' remit is both governance and strategy.
-
Any relevant policies, procedures, and activities that the company plans to undertake by its next COP to fulfill this criterion, including goals, timelines, metrics, and responsible staff
-
Board establishes, where permissible, a committee or assigns an individual board member with responsibility for corporate sustainability.
-
Board (or committee), where permissible, approves formal reporting on corporate sustainability (Communication on Progress)